Get Out of Jail Free!

By Patrick F. Cannon

I was once a juror in a capital murder case. To be brief, it involved a black married couple who had attended a party in a Chicago public housing complex parking lot. The wife had become very drunk, and one of the attendees began making fun of her. Her husband went to their unit, got a metal baseball bat, and proceeded to beat her tormenter to death.

            The trial took a week out of my life – four days of motions and testimony and one of jury deliberations. The jury included representatives from Cook County’s three major ethnicities – white, black, and Hispanic, and of both sexes. I was elected foreman. The defendants had separate attorneys, who did their best, but the state had numerous eye witnesses whose testimony was consistent. In our deliberations, it was agreed that the wife had been too drunk to meaningfully participate in the murder, so we voted to acquit her.

            The husband was a different matter. He had gone to his home intentionally to get a weapon, which he had clearly used with the intent to kill. It should have been an easy matter to find him guilty, but there was one female black juror who refused to do so, on the grounds that she would never vote to convict a black man who had come to the defense of a black woman. She wouldn’t budge, so I finally sent a note to the judge that further deliberations were pointless. She was forced to declare mistrial.

            While most jury trials result in a verdict, mistrials do happen. I was sorry it happened in my case, but I got over it. But I find it harder to get over President Trump issuing pardons to everyone convicted of participating in the January 6, 2020, riots at the U.S. Capital. As a reminder, 1220 defendants were convicted, 221 at jury trials and the rest through plea bargains. Although some defendants were found not guilty on some charges, all were convicted of at least some. There were no mistrials. So, I ask myself this question: what do the 2,652 people who served as jurors in these cases think of President Trump’s pardons? Perhaps Fox News should ask them.

            Maybe they could also ask the jurors who convicted Nevada politician Michele Fiore for using police memorial funds for her plastic surgery; or those who sent reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley to jail for tax evasion and bank fraud. They received pardons too, as did Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former president of Honduras who was just beginning to serve his sentence for drug trafficking.

He also commuted the sentence of major donor Imaad Zuberi , convicted of concealing his lobbying for Sri Lanka, illegal campaign contributions, obstruction of justice (and a few more too). And let’s not forget the full pardon he signed for Paul Walczak, who pled guilty to tax fraud, for failing to pay nearly $11 million in withholding, Social Security and Medicare taxes for his employees. The pardon came shortly after his mother, Elizabeth Fago, had attended a $1 million a person fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago.

            President Trump isn’t alone in abusing the pardon power. President Biden pardoned his son and granted preemptive pardons to a few more of his relatives just in case. And other presidents have abused the pardon power on behalf of friends and relatives. Both Presidents Obama and Biden commuted the sentences of thousands of prisoners serving mandatory time for drug-related crimes that they believed were unduly harsh. Not everyone agreed.

            I have been accused of suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome, about which I wrote just last week. But I’m always happy to give him credit for fixing the mess at the southern border (which got him elected), and for forcing our NATO allies to admit they have a role in defending Europe. He brokered the (I’m afraid) temporary peace in Gaza, severely damaged Iran’s nuclear program, and is now working to bring peace to Ukraine. He has also managed to reduce the Federal workforce, while increasing spending overall. A notable achievement!

            While the jury is still out, he’s attempting to redress the historic imbalance in import duties charged by us and our so-called friends; and in reducing the often-onerous rules and regulations that have stymied growth and progress. So, let’s give the devil his due, and not be surprised when he pre-emptively pardons his appointees, relatives, and friends on the morning of January 20, 2029. After all, Joe did it.

Copyright 2026, Patrick F. Cannon

4 thoughts on “Get Out of Jail Free!

  1. Politically motivated people in government (the media too) seem to have a different perspective on justice and criminality than you and I, common citizens, do.

    I hate to make sweeping generalizations but the patterns are hard to ignore.

    At first, I thought you were writing about the disgraceful policies of Chicago prosecutors, and elsewhere, often supported by characters like billionaire scumbag George Soros, who have systematically allowed criminals of certain ethnic characteristics to be released in society to commit offenses against innocent victims again and again.

    I’m no fan of the pardons Trump has issued, following what seems to be a well-established tradition of presidents absolving convicted offenders whom they feel have been unfairly prosecuted. I suppose presidents have the legal authority to do this, but the optics, to mix a metaphor, stink.

    Biden, or whoever was acting on behalf of that pathetic dummy, did something I had never seen before: pardon people who haven’t (yet) been convicted of any crime.

    Can presidents do that, pardon others for potential crimes?

    But aren’t people in power automatically immune to criminal prosecution? (Mr. and Mrs Clinton, and you too, Mrs. Pelosi, are you listening?).

    The Democrats made a huge spectacle of the January 6 “insurrection” where a mob of mostly peaceful, unarmed protesters were allowed entrance into the Capitol to create havoc. Not all of them were Trump supporters. Some have been identified as Antifa. There are questions about the incident that still have not been clarified.

    The jury is still out, if anyone other than the Dems still cares.

    Although the obsessive media have spun the narrative and cast Trump as a malign character that he is not, there is no evidence that he ever directed the protesters to storm the Capitol as they did. Sure, he was unhappy at the way the election was conducted, and rightly so. The recent revelation that 315,000 votes were illegally cast in Georgia in 2000 may be the tip of the iceberg.

    On the other hand Trump was wrong to expect VP Pence to intervene, an ill-advised gambit. Pence for his part followed the letter of the law, and was (briefly) commended in the media, but instead of it making him a hero, it made him an anathema and ended his political career. (Trump, in contrast, was re-elected in the court of public opinion, convincingly).

    The country needs to embrace the rule of law, but there seem to be so many exceptions.

    Justice isn’t blind as a bat, it’s cross-eyed.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Happy New Year! And as usual, hope for the best and prepare for the worst!

        I used to wear an “I LIKE IKE” button during presidential elections.

        I wonder how he’d fare in today’s political climate. In the 50s he had to deal with Jim Crow segregation, illegal Mexican immigration (he deported a million Mexicans in Operation Wetback), communist infiltration (he chose as his VP anti-communist Nixon, who was hounded by the leftist press continuously till his resignation after Watergate), presided over an historic peacetime budget deficit, faced the Suez crisis, had to deal with criminal labor unions and a communist Cuba, and suffered from serious health problems. But he came across as an accomplished, amiable man and was well-liked. I liked him.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment