Freedom of Speech is Great, But…

Freedom of Speech is Great, But…

By Patrick F. Cannon

I’m an absolutist when it comes to freedom of speech. When President Trump says something stupid, I cringe just like most people, but I would never deny his right to be an idiot.

This past weekend, NFL players, in protest of the president’s calling on team owners to fire players who don’t stand respectfully for the national anthem, exercised their free speech rights by kneeling or locking arms, or both, during the anthem. The basic point was to protest against continuing bias in the way black men are treated by the police in many parts of the country. They had every right to do as they did. Instead of condemning them we should try to understand why they did it.

If urged to explain why this country is so great, many Americans would give “freedom of speech” as an example, without actually fully believing in it. Take Richard Petty, for example.  For those of you who don’t know who he is, he holds the record for number of victories in stock car racing. Now retired, he heads up a team in the sport’s major series. When asked about the controversy, he commented that any member of his team that didn’t stand respectfully for the anthem would be fired. Now, I didn’t take the time to check, but I doubt Mr. Petty has many African-American employees, NASCAR (that’s the governing body of the sport) not being well known for its diversity, either in its drivers or fan base. Mr. Petty no doubt considers himself a proud American, but has he read the Bill of Rights?

On the other side of the political spectrum we have Middlebury College in the Vermont town of the same name. I’ve been there and it’s everyone’s idea of what a quaint New England town should look like. It even has a covered bridge. The college campus itself fits the image perfectly. Is bucolic the right word?

Anyway, on March 2 Charles Murray, a sociologist best known for his book The Bell Curve — which concluded, among other controversial findings, that African-Americans were, as a group, less intelligent than whites — was scheduled to speak on campus. As you can imagine, his views are not widely held, and he has often been accused of promoting eugenics, which – in its most extreme form – advocates the sterilization and even euthanasia of those deemed unfit to procreate. Adolph Hitler was a notable enthusiast, as was the Lone Eagle, Charles Lindbergh. Although largely forgotten now, forced sterilization was practiced widely in this country until very recently. Look it up; you’ll be amazed at how common it was.

A recognized campus organization had invited him. The college’s administration, while generally opposed to his ideas, had no objection, provided a discussion would follow, led by a faculty member who would be permitted to question his research and conclusions. Murray agreed to this. In the event, he was shouted down by many of the 400 students who attended. He and his interlocutor, Professor Allison Stanger, were then taken to a television studio, where the presentation actually then took place. Later, when escorting Murray to his car, Stanger was actually injured by a hostile crowd barring their way.

So, we have two events. In one, African-American athletes – widely supported by their white team mates, by the way – staged a silent protest at what they believe are injustices suffered by their race. In the other, privileged college students (Middlebury is not cheap) shout down a speaker to prevent his views being heard, a phenomenon that has become all too common at our colleges and universities, where one would expect an atmosphere that would encourage the free expression of ideas instead of their suppression.

Attempts to limit free speech are nothing new in this country. But they are always wrong.

Copyright 2017, Patrick F. Cannon







5 thoughts on “Freedom of Speech is Great, But…

  1. The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for every American. “Congress shall make no law….” it says. This basically means free public, political speech for me and for thee, NFL players included, as far as the government is concerned.

    When Harold Washington was Chicago mayor, some modern-day Rembrandt exhibited a portrait of hizzoner dressed in drag. In poor taste and insulting? You betcha! Did hizzoner celebrate its artistic freedom? Not exactly! The artist was nobody nobody sent. He would have had a better crack at immortality with a Piss Christ.

    Private entities can set their own rules, within the boundaries of the law. Take Google, for example. It recently canned some programmer for writing a memo discussing gender inequality in his workplace. The poor fellow now seeks alternate employment. Google is within its rights. It broke no law. The fellow failed to conform within Google’s expectations.

    The NFL is a private entity (though their stadium palaces are largely public-funded). About two-thirds of NFL players are black (in the NBA, over 80%). Their teams make large sums of money. Would the owners risk their businesses by firing a black player for protesting something that is framed as a racial justice issue? Not anymore than NASCAR, which I am sure is equally cognizant of its revenue base.

    But what about the customers who watch these weekly NFL episodes of mostly black on black violence punctuated by committee meetings, endless replay reviews and commercials? They pay cash for the entertainment value of their sports fantasies. If the games start to lose fans, will the owners and sponsors feel differently about the national anthem?

    There’s no question about the wrongs of racial discrimination. One does not need a highly paid football player to be reminded. Everyone knows it is wrong, even the people who practice it know it is wrong. In the US today you’d need to look under a lot of rocks to find any tangible support of racism. Obama opined people still harbor it in their hearts. But who, let alone Obama, knows what lurks in the hearts of others except by their words and deeds? Obama may have been thinking about himself for all we know.

    One gets tired of protests. The more righteous they are, the more tiresome. Only the most spectacular and outrageous draw attention anymore. Trump is not the flag, let alone the US justice system. Let the players turn their backs when he enters the room, let them sue in the courts for redress of perceived wrongs. It is their right. But if these young entertainers in their prosperous livelihoods can’t figure out how beloved and privileged they are in this much maligned and politicized country, they will never understand what freedom is.

    Go Cubs!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s