Better Not Yell Fire!

Better Not Yell Fire!

By Patrick F. Cannon

The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States – the first-ever national written constitution – has been a damn nuisance from the start. Here it is, in case you have forgotten it:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It’s part of the Bill of Rights, which went into effect in 1791. As it was the first of 10 amendments, James Madison and the other folks responsible obviously thought it might be the most important. It has certainly been one of the most argued over by our fellow citizens and the courts. And still is.

While the meaning of other amendments may be subject to debate – the Second Amendment, with its confusion about just what the phrase “A well-regulated Militia” actually means in relation to the “right to keep and bear Arms.” is a good example – I have always thought that the First Amendment simply means what it says. Read it again. What can “make no law” mean other than, well, make no law. Nevertheless, some people have always had a problem with some or all it.

There are still folks who think religious freedom means the freedom to be a Methodist, Baptist, Episcopalian or (more recently and grudgingly) a Roman Catholic. They’re not at all sure about Jews, and they wish Muslims would go back to the desert where they belong. The current president, although I doubt he believes in anything except himself, seems to be their spiritual (sorry about that) leader.

It’s that second clause, however, that seems the most confusing to many of our fellow citizens, including President Trump. Notice that “freedom of speech, or of the press” are grouped together. With a few exceptions – yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre, advocating the violent overthrow of the government, knowingly spreading lies in public about your sister-in-law – you can pretty much say what you want. That doesn’t mean that anyone is going to pay attention to you. I have always thought that the corollary of you getting to say what you want, is my right to ignore you.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to work for everyone. For example, on university campuses throughout the Republic, what I would describe as the “Marxist Left” has decided that it isn’t enough to simply ignore speech that they find distasteful; they must actively prevent it from taking place at all. If a conservative speaker is invited by the university or an affiliated group, these groups will raise an outcry, and often have succeeded in getting the invitation withdrawn by craven university administrators. When this fails, they will show up at the event and prevent the speaker from being heard, even if it means resorting to violence.

Although they would deny this characterization, this is of course a classic totalitarian tactic. It was used on the right by Mussolini and Hitler, and on the left by Stalin, Mao, Castro, Chavez and the various Kims. The justification has always been the same – we must prevent the average schmo from being contaminated by false ideologies. Despite their demonstrable failures, the ideas of such luminaries as Marx and Marcuse refuse to die.

Widespread distrust of freedom of the press also refuses to die, particularly among politicians. I’m quite aware that even the most respected newspapers make mistakes, and may even show bias in some of their coverage. But in general, newspapers like the New York Times, Washington Post and Chicago Tribune have strict standards of accuracy for their news columns. Politicians do not like to be held accountable – President Obama didn’t like it, and President Trump actually hates it. He has convinced his deluded followers that most of what is written about him is “fake news.”  He thus subscribes to that other classic totalitarian dogma – say a lie often enough and some people will begin to think it’s true.

He thinks the press is out to get him, and they are. As they should. As they should with all politicians, regardless of party. It particularly rankles President Trump that the Washington Post has kept track of his demonstrable lies or misstatements. As of March 4, the total was 9,014. Well, I guess he really is the greatest.

######

Copyright 2019, Patrick F. Cannon

 

 

 

2 thoughts on “Better Not Yell Fire!

  1. No one disputes the constitutional right of freedom of the press, especially the press, except when politicians, or the press itself, disagrees with someone else’s ideas or simply doesn’t like somebody. There was a time when there was a news page, for factual news reporting, and an editorial page, for opinion. Now the major news outlets are politicized and the news crafted to fit the media’s politics, which today is predominantly leftist and anti-Trump.

    Example: News stories from today’s Washington Post:

    “Trump disparaged Boeing 737s in private before grounding plane”

    “Trump will soon be forced to issue his first two vetoes, as Congress seeks to wrest back power
    The Senate stands up to President Trump on Yemen and the wall.”

    “Gary Cohn says Trump is ‘desperate’ for trade deal with China
    The White House is “living in chaos” on major decisions, according to the president’s former top economic adviser.”

    “Tucker Carlson says he’s the victim of a powerful bully. Meet the 24-year-old who found the tapes.
    In reality, credit goes to Madeline Peltz, a 20-something in her first adult job who lives in the basement of a D.C. house she rents with five other people, a few cats and a dog named Noodles.”

    And it goes on and on from there, all negative “news” with anything Trump or Republican related, unless it’s a story of how Republicans decided to be non-partisan and agree with Democrats. There’s a kernel of fact in all of these stories. Like Mae West, they’re as pure as the driven snow, but they’re drifting.

    Okay, a newspaper has the right to do this, and readers have the right not to read it. But the prevailing animus against an elected president and the expression of ideas contrary to the leftist canon of thought, not only in the media but also in education and the entertainment industry has become so intense as to be a distortion.

    The WP, even as it acknowledges that public trust in the media has eroded, takes the position that political bias is a matter of perception, that it’s always the other guy that’s biased, that news outlets are still more trustworthy than other sources of information, like politicians, corporations and no doubt former real estate tycoons prone to compulsive mendacity.

    And they may have a valid point. So what can a person believe? The polished voice in the media, or one’s lying eyes and experience?

    Like

  2. Without an objective free press, real journalism dies and whatever remnants of this “democracy” – where actual journalism both reported the news and gave actual analysis with an unbiased editorial of the facts without taking sides on the news, dies a slow death similar to one jumping off of Mount Everest. The impact will not kill you but the lack of means to stop your rapid decent will kill you. I do not understand how we got here being a child born in 1970. There was a time where the journalist for print and televised content were given both access to report the facts of the truth as well as be given the latitude to ask critical yet insightful questions not for their prestige but so the general public can better understand all matters deemed newsworthy. I seek investigative journalists seeking to tell the truth no matter how difficult the truth may be. Follow the lead, assess, question and verify the source. Ensure the source providing the information can be verified by three outside sources other than the one you are speaking with regarding the information. Then you compile the information cite the source and tell the truth. Today, everyone is in a rush to tell what they think it is rather than know what the truth is before they speak. No matter what…

    “You’re not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can’t face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” ~Malcolm X

    “Just once in a while let us exalt the importance of ideas and information.”
    “We cannot make good news out of bad practice.”
    ~ Edward R. Murrow

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s