Is No News Good News?
By Patrick F. Cannon
(This piece was originally published a couple of years ago, and I have updated it.. Recently, Alden Capital has increased its stake in the Chicago Tribune. If it gains control, it will accelerate the decline of a newspaper that was once one of the country’s top five. It has gutted the staffs of every newspaper it has bought. The Trib has already cut its staff significantly; it now has no regular classical, jazz or even pop music critic, and has long been without a Washington bureau or any foreign correspondents. And just a few days ago, both the architectural critic and main restaurant writer announced they were leaving. But the movers and shakers in Chicago who could band together to save the paper don’t seem to care; perhaps they think it’s good riddance.)
When I moved to Chicago in 1946, there were 5 daily newspapers – Herald-American (the Hearst paper), Daily Times, Sun, Daily News and Tribune. The Sun and Times merged and survives, as does the Tribune. When I began riding the bus to work in the Loop in 1956, almost everyone was reading either the Sun-Times or Tribune; on the way home, they picked up either the Herald American or Daily News. Newsstands were common and convenient.
Now, when I ride the train downtown, as I do two or three times a month, it is rare to see anyone reading a newspaper; almost everyone, however, is staring at their phones. Are they reading a digital edition of a newspaper? No doubt a few are. While its print circulation has tumbled, the Tribune has seen increases in digital subscribers, as have to a much greater extent The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. And it’s easy to see a future when only digital editions of these and other newspapers will be available. Frankly, I’ll miss turning those pages every morning, but I guess people missed the town crier too.
But what about local news? Between 2004 and 2018, 516 rural newspapers closed, as did 1,294 in urban areas. And almost every surviving newspaper has seen cuts in their editorial staff. In hundreds of counties, there are no newspapers of any kind. Which means no one to regularly keep tabs on the activities of local governments. Perhaps you live in Shangri La, where the politicians always have your best interests at heart; but I live in Illinois, where ex-governors and aldermen spend their declining years in prison.
Although actual figures are difficult to come by, the total daily circulation of the Tribune – print and digital – is now about 550,000; the Sun-Times less than half that. In their heyday, their print circulations were about 850,000 and 450,000 respectively. Where then are the missing readers getting their news?
Network news programs make some effort to cover national news, but can only scratch the surface in the 30 minutes they have (actually, more like 22 after you deduct the commercials and promos). As you’ve probably noticed, I think local TV news is laughable. Of course, there is no lack of “news” available on the cable channels and on-line. Thus, consumers are able to shop for the point of view about news that agrees with their own. While both Fox News and MSNBC give us a bit of straight news, most of their content panders to the existing biases of their viewers. No rational person would watch either. Even CNN seems to have been taken over by talking heads.
There are any number of paid sites that cover politics exclusively, but most people aren’t interested in diving that deeply. In the end, only the daily newspapers – and the Associated Press – have the staff and resources to broadly cover the news, both local and national. Let’s say right here that none of them is perfect. Let’s also concede that most of their staff members tend to the liberal side of the spectrum. They make mistakes, sometimes serious ones that lead their critics to discount the great majority of their coverage that is actually accurate and unbiased.
With a few exceptions, mainly Fox News, former President Trump accused most of them of trafficking in “fake news.” I define “fake news” as the news you don’t want to hear, whether you’re on the left or the right. The former president is notably adverse to the truth. He has lied so often that it’s probably pointless to any longer keep track of them, as the Washington Post did (for the record, the final count was around 20,000).
As for me, I’ll continue to read the paper every day. If it goes all digital, I’ll read it that way. If I want an up-to-date weather forecast, and breaking entertainment news, I’ll tune in to the local news, whose news directors read the newspapers to see what’s actually going on around town. So should we all. But what if that newspaper didn’t exist? Or its staff was so depleted that it could no longer cover all the important news? I guess we could all go to the beauty salon or barber shop for the latest scoop. You do still go to the barber shop, don’t you?
Copyright 2021, Patrick F. Cannon
11 thoughts on “Is No News Good News?”
Another great post – I’ll forward it to my cousin and retired minister – he doesn’t like politics but maybe he will like this one. Judy
The newspaper is well on its way to becoming an anachronism. The internet, and before that television, has seen to that. USA Today, sold on sidewalks in dispensers that looked like TV sets, was an early blow, condensing news to a third grade reading level. Now its content has achieved that grade.
There is more news at hand than there ever was when the Trib was in its heyday. ALL news sources have bias. They have their audiences and have monetized their slant. Much of the news is narrative, aka fake (Like the January 6 “insurrection.”). If the source has a “fact checker,” even more so. Heroes and Villains. In our censorious cancel culture, independent journalists are bagging groceries.
For local news, Chicago has radio. I sometimes stream WBBM (if only to remind myself why we moved out of Illinois!). Locally here, an afternoon show provides updates on what’s going on by regularly scheduling city and county officials, school superintendents, the police chief and others to report on what’s happening. In addition, there are public media and various local websites that furnish information, as well as an online neighborhood network that features everything from lost pets to debates on the current zoning controversy.
If anything, there is too much information. I can update myself on most any issue anywhere almost instantly. So I don’t miss newspapers too much. There’s no subway or El here where I need newspapers to avoid making eye contact with the creep sitting opposite. Not only does their demise reduce substantially the waste I have to recycle, but I don’t have to wash the cheap ink off my hands from the newsprint.
If anything, I’m surprised the Trib and Sun-Times are still in circulation. Their decline does provoke a twinge of nostalgia, like the demise of long distance rail travel, full service gas stations, manual transmissions, service clubs and corner candy stores. “Brown from the Morning Sun” no longer calls on the telephone. Sad!
It’s not the medium, but the reporting at its base that matters. I look at Real Clear Politics most days and see only posts that slant the news one way or the other. Not everyone has the judgement to sort it all out. As Joe Friday once said: “Just the facts, mam.”
Facts, eh? And the newspapers feel qualified they can sort it all out for the less educated? LOL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some try, some don’t.
They may need to check first with Biden’s Ministry of Truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you sure you don’t mean the New York Times?
Didn’t realize there was a difference.
The revelations in Time magazine should dispel any doubts about how corrupt and manipulative today’s media has become.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read it. Sad how the Times is letting the lunatics run the asylum.
I gave up on the Times years ago, but was referring to Molly Ball’s piece in Time magazine on how the media conspired to “fortify” the election.
LikeLiked by 1 person