It Took 250 Years!

By Patrick F. Cannon

If current trends continue and our luck holds, it looks like the interest on the national debt will reach and slightly exceed $1 Trillion for the first time in our 250 years of fiscal ups and downs. In case you’re wondering, interest payments are now 15 percent of the Federal budget. Here are the amounts per year starting in 2020 (in billions):              

2020                315

                        2021                352

                        2022                476

                        2023                659

                        2024                852

                        2025                970

                        2026                1.04 Trillion (est.)      

It seems to hardly matter which political party controls Congress or the White House – the number keep going up in a non-partisan high-speed elevator.

            I confess I had some hopes for fiscal restraint when champion father and avenging angel Elon Musk  — and his teeny bopper army – descended on Washington to drive out the money spenders. Alas, it turned out he was robbing Peter (and the rest of the Apostles) to pay Paul. Although it goes up minute by minute, the current national debt is $39.07 trillion, or $113,792 per person, including newborns. This year, the projected deficit will be $2 Trillion. Onward and upward!

            Aside from 1998-2001, when we miraculously had budget surpluses, deficits have been a way of life for most citizens alive today. At the same time, income tax rates rarely have been lower. The mid-1980s had GDP growth rates averaging about four percent a year with a top rate of about 50 percent.  Today’s top rate of 37 percent applies only to the amount of table income that exceeds approximately $640,000 for a single payer. That same prosperous person only pays 10 percent for the first $12,400; 12 percent for income from $12,400 up to $50,000; 22 percent for the amount from that $50,000 up to $105,000 – well, you get the idea.

            Not everyone earns enough to pay any Federal income taxes, but everyone pays the payroll tax of 7.65 percent —  which includes Medicare – on incomes up to $184,500. And our local and state governments grab their share. The average American pays nearly 30 percent of his or her income in taxes (the top ten percent of earners bear 90 percent of the total tax burden). Nevertheless, if governments were businesses most would have to declare bankruptcy.  (Let’s pause to give a shout out to these states, which are tops in fiscal stability: Utah, Delaware, New York, Iowa, and Georgia.)

            The easy answer to the fiscal mess it to either spend less, tax more, or a bit of both. Neither seems attractive to our current set of politicians.  Maybe one of my faithful readers has an idea that will get us out of this mess. If so, please do share it with us and your congressman and senators . It could win you Nobel Prize for economics and the undying love of your fellow Americans. Or be ignored until the bubble bursts, as it inevitably and eventually does.

Copyright 2026, Patrick F. Cannon

3 thoughts on “It Took 250 Years!

  1. If the trend continues as it has in places like California, Illinois and New York (wait, did you say New York is among states tops in fiscal stability?), the government will gradually need to take possession of all the nation’s wealth to cover its debts.

    In other words, someday (we can’t say when) we will at long last become a Socialist Utopia. And a Democratic one to boot!

    The problem is the spending. Uncle Sam is no Calvin Coolidge. Sam doesn’t earn money but taxes, prints and borrows it, and he likes to be liberal with the money earned by others, in his deep commitment to make life better, in so many wonderful ways, for its citizens, and even non-citizens. And such altruism can result in making life better for Sam, too.

    Bettering life is an enlightened, noble calling. God helps those who help themselves, and governments are ever ready to do just that. Only cranky, mean-spirited, selfish persons could question the motivation.

    In New York (did you really say it was tops in stability?), the mayor of the country’s largest city has declared a master plan to transfer ownership (i.e., force greedy landlords to sell) neglected housing to responsible stewards (the city and its NGOs) who can give those neglected buildings and tenants the love, dignity and care they deserve.

    As NYC becomes a benevolent landlord, in California the state is discovering the benefits of being rich again, by taking just a teeny tiny percentage of the capital of its wealthiest residents (just 10 measly percent, they’ll hardly miss it). California has great visions of making life better for people, whether the recipients of its largesse are honest and law-biding or not, and that costs money. Your money.

    There is no end to this vicious cycle. California’s eyes twinkle when it gazes lovingly across the Pacific at China’s warm collectivism. In New York, the social justice benefits of the EU cause sugar plums to dance. I’m not sure what Illinois is thinking. Pritzker & Co. just like to control the Benjamins.

    The solution to our ever increasing indebtedness is not more taxes. We pay plenty, in so many different ways. Giving government revenue just makes it hungry.

    Instead, we should elect only miserly curmudgeons like Coolidge to public office. They will be diligent in starving the beast. The beast will howl and lash out, but our Coolidges will stay the course, and just say no. People will prosper again as they decide how to spend their own money. We may even see a great revival of private charity.

    I, for my part, will donate my Nobel prize to the Little Sisters of the Poor.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Coolidge was a regular Polonius. I’m sure he paid off his debts, if he had any, promptly!

        Like

Leave a comment